|
|
Practice-Based Learning and Improvement
Definition and Goals
Throughout a professional’s career, new knowledge
or treatments are developed and recognized as efficacious. A professional
also often encounters clinical problems with which he or she has limited
experience. These situations require a willingness to develop new knowledge
and skills, recognition of knowledge and skill gaps and an approach for
continuously evaluating and improving one’s knowledge and skills.
Residents must review and critically assess the scientific literature
to determine how quality of care can be improved in relation to one’s
own practice. By the time of graduation, residents must be able to investigate,
evaluate and improve their patient care practices.
Knowledge
The resident must demonstrate that his/her knowledge
is inherently incomplete by:
- Ability to assess gaps in one’s knowledge base through
participation in didactic seminars, conferences and supervision
- Familiarity with the scope of recent scientific literature
in child and adolescent psychiatry and related fields
- Familiarity with research design and statistical methods,
in order to be able to evaluate the literature critically
Skills
The resident must continually monitor his or her knowledge
base and its impact on clinical practice by demonstrating:
- Ability to evaluate caseload and practice experience
in a systematic manner.
This may include:
• the maintaining of patient logs
• the review of patient records and outcomes
• obtaining evaluations from patients (e.g., outcomes and patient
satisfaction)
• obtaining appropriate supervision
• maintaining a system for examining errors in practice and initiating
improvements to eliminate or reduce errors
- Ability to locate, appraise and assimilate “best
practices,” practice parameters and treatment guidelines that are
relevant to the care of childhood psychiatric disorders
- Ability to acquire and integrate information from a
variety of sources, including:
• medical libraries
• use of information technology, including Internet-based searches
and literature databases (e.g., Medline)
• drug information databases
• scientific literature
• presentations and consultations from specialists
• attending conferences at scientific meetings
- Ability to read and evaluate the scientific literature
critically and apply information from scientific literature to current
patient/clinical problems. The resident should be able to assess the
generality or applicability of research findings to one’s patients,
in relation to their socio-demographic and clinical characteristics.
This may include the following:
• using appropriate journals and knowledge for what are necessary
parts of successful research, review articles, consultations, teaching
and clinical practice
• applying knowledge of common methodologies employed in psychiatric
research to evaluate studies, particularly in appraising diagnostic
validity and/or therapeutic effectiveness
• conducting and presenting reviews of current research in such
formats as journal clubs, didactic seminars, conferences and/or original
publications
• researching and summarizing a particular problem that derives
from the resident’s caseload
• developing and pursuing effective remediation strategies for
clinical practice that are based on critical review of the scientific
literature
Attitudes
The resident must demonstrate the following attitudes
regarding practice-based learning and improvement:
- Recognize the need for lifelong learning and monitoring
of one’s own practice
- Be willing to pursue continuing education and supervised
experiences to keep one’s own practice commensurate with the community
standard of care
- A willingness to obtain information from electronic
databases and scientific literature in child and adolescent psychiatry
and related fields
- Be willing to remain abreast on scientific advances,
new clinical approaches and investigations of clinical outcomes
- Recognize that the scientific literature is constantly
evolving, that no one report or idea is necessarily true for all situations
and that the literature should be critically judged for its methodology
and applicability
|
|